If you missed our discussion with Marcus, Opal allowed constructs like that until week ago.
Uko Sent from my iPhone > On 06 Sep 2014, at 10:46, Mark Rizun <[email protected]> wrote: > > You are right there is such a code. > And it's really strange how it compiled earlier:) > Thanks > > > 2014-09-06 11:42 GMT+03:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>: >> well, this is weird :) >> the error you have is usually because you have something like this: >> >> myMethod: aParameter >> … >> aParameter := something. >> … >> >> (same can happen with blocks). >> >> you cannot assign a parameter… and compiler protests if you try. >> but I wander how you could introduce the problem the first time. Compiler >> should deny that kind of construction. >> >> Anyway, your fix is to change that :) >> >> Esteban >> >>> On 06 Sep 2014, at 10:39, Mark Rizun <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Package of my project RewriteTool. >>> Here it is: >>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MarkRizun/RewriteTool/packages/RewriteTool >>> >>> >>> 2014-09-06 11:33 GMT+03:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>: >>>> which package? >>>> >>>> >>>> On 06 Sep 2014, at 10:28, Mark Rizun <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi everyone! >>>> > >>>> > When loading a package via Monticello, while compiling methods it gives >>>> > an >>>> > error: >>>> > Syntax Error: Cannot store into and then a method. >>>> > What does it mean? >>>> > >>>> > Best, >>>> > Mark >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > View this message in context: >>>> > http://forum.world.st/Syntax-Error-Cannot-store-into-tp4776675.html >>>> > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> > >
