Issue reported https://github.com/spec-framework/spec-framework.github.io/issues/2
On 11 September 2014 06:07, Alain Busser <alain.bus...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I can confirm that this page looks really strange: > http://spec.st/docs/own-model/ > > At the end, only the word "bindings" appears, the rest is security ink... > Also, all the lines are separated by a darker shade of gray and the script, > if it was visible, would appear as a collection of lines rather than a > single text. > > Alain > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Johan Fabry <jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl> wrote: >> >> >> We are passionate people with strong opinions. We have to be, otherwise we >> would not be spending our time on this language which is not ‘normal’. >> Sometimes this causes disagreements. Sometimes these disagreements cannot be >> resolved. When the latter happens, this is a sad thing. >> >> I am not interested in judging, determining who was ‘right’ and who was >> ‘wrong’. From his/her point of view everybody is ‘right’ (at least to a high >> degree). I just want to do what, for me, is the best for the overall >> project. I may be ‘wrong’, but I do not know any better. I’m just another >> guy, you know? >> >> All of the above being said, for me, the best action is to give my little >> bit of support to the version of Spec that is in the Pharo distribution >> because I think that this is the best for the project. I would like to keep >> working on the documentation and improving it. Specifically I mean the >> version that Stef linked to below as it corresponds to what’s in Pharo. I >> have had some ideas about missing content as well. So when stuff calms down, >> let’s sync and work on further improving the documentation. >> >> On Sep 10, 2014, at 3:45 PM, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: >> >> Hello andy >> >> I'm sorry about this story. The pharo board (Tudor Girba, Sven van >> Cackenberghe, Esteban Lorenzano, Marcus Denker and me) >> will react officially this is problem. I'm in the board but I do not >> want that people think that I'm trying any action that would >> be about personal nature, especially since I personally supported a >> lot Benjamin during all these years - and I do not understand >> his sudden action. Now since this is out of my reach, I prefer to >> focus on making Pharo better and I'm working on that actively :) >> >> I decided as one of Pharo founder to follow the board and let them >> handle this situation. I decided that I will not influence nor act >> because I prefer to be in positive mindset and push Pharo further. >> The board told me that they will clarify the situation, especially >> since there are actions that were not correct. >> I'm waiting as you for an official statement from the board, and I >> know that it will come and be really clear. >> As you can imagine the board wants to do it right and settle it as an >> example for any future frameworks or part (Zinc, Glamour, Athens, TxText, >> ...) >> that (will) compose Pharo. >> We are setting an industrial consortium to push Pharo for real (As you >> can see in the reporthttp://consortium.pharo.org/web?_s=DiSVVVKk3sFm2ouZ >> Inria put 300 K euros not counting the salary of the permanent members >> of our team) and rules should be clear and followed. >> >> Now the GPL license does not apply to the version of Spec that is >> available in the Pharo distribution since it is MIT from the beginning >> and it will stay forever as it. We did not fork it. We are actively >> improving Spec. Some clean ups got already integrated and others are >> pending. >> We will maintain and improve the Spec documentation too. For example >> we will probably add the part >> written by Stefan Eggermont that was submitted but never integrated. >> I'm waiting just to avoid adding to the confusion. >> >> You can find a version of the Spec documentation as part of the next >> book: >> >> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoForTheEnterprise/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Spec/Spec.pier.pdf >> It may be not fully in par with the github repo but we will sync with >> Johan Fabry too in the future. >> >> >> >> >> ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- >> >> Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry >> PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile >> >
