On 24 Sep 2014, at 18:35, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kube...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Marcus for the explanation.
>
> So now I understand that if I want to analyse existing
> packages/class/methods/etc in the image, Ring is not a kind of interest.
>
> But as I think about it, if someone uses Ring as a base to analyse
> environment, then it could be useful to use the same analysis tool for any
> source, e.g. not loaded packages. Am I right or are the some limitations?
>
>
That is the idea… Ring Definition and normal classes/methods share a common API
and can be used interchangeably.
Marcus
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
