Well, I'm porting existing code with tests, so I would prefer to avoid changing how they work. Now I might as well consider it a rewrite…
On 28 October 2014 21:49, Attila Magyar <[email protected]> wrote: > This is not supported. BabyMock is designed to test the message flow between > objects, and not the internal implementation of an object. If the part what > you want to stub out is not a private implementation detail then maybe > extracting it to an object could help, otherwise couldn't you test the whole > object? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/BabyMock2-Stubbing-individual-methods-from-existing-instance-tp4787228p4787303.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
