It's worse than that anyway, now it's missing GTInspector. What package provides that class?
> On Dec 14, 2014, at 3:06 AM, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think that roassal packaging is naive. > Roassal core should not depend from Glamour > and there should be a RoassalGlamour configuration > > Stf > Le 14/12/14 07:21, Daniel Lyons a écrit : >> I loaded Roassal2 from the Configuration Browser and it added some menu >> items, one of which produces a debug statement about GLMPager. The problem >> is easily remedied by installing Glamour. I suggest there is a missing >> dependency in ConfigurationOfRoassal2. >> >> — >> Daniel Lyons >> >> >> >> >> >> > > — Daniel Lyons
