>
> I reviewed some of your changes for that issue, but it was difficult,
> because you made
> some new changes and it wasn't clear when it is ready or what was the
> original error
> and if it is solved now.
>

Yes I know it was a bit messy with this one, sorry for that ;)


>
> you can set the state to "resolved" again and wait for the monkey to
> do the validation again. If there is still, there will be a new
> "Issue Validation Failed"-result page.
>

Thanks, has to try it.

Mark

2015-01-05 23:10 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <[email protected]>:

> Hi Mark,
>
> I reviewed some of your changes for that issue, but it was difficult,
> because you made
> some new changes and it wasn't clear when it is ready or what was the
> original error
> and if it is solved now.
>
> you can set the state to "resolved" again and wait for the monkey to
> do the validation again. If there is still, there will be a new
> "Issue Validation Failed"-result page.
>
>
> nicolai
>
>
> 2015-01-05 20:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Rizun <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> While ago, I've resolved an issue  14254
>> <
>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14254/AST-method-replaceWith-does-not-change-source-interval
>> >
>> and validation was successful. Since that time, I didn't check this issue
>> as
>> was busy. Turned out after successful validation, there was a failure,
>> which
>> I can't take a look at, because it's not found (404 error). Just wanted
>> this
>> slice to be included in Pharo4.
>>
>> Best,
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://forum.world.st/Problem-with-bugtracker-tp4797910.html
>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to