I do not think anybody is trying to compel you to be politically correct
or intellectually dishonest.
However, most of what you have been doing is being done in the name of
marketing. When marketing you choose what words you use and what words
you don't use. You choose in order to effect a certain result.
The words you choose have consequences. From the handle you choose to
label yourself by, to the words you choose to describe Smalltalk or Pharo.
You are a free person, living in a free part of the world. You make your
choices for your words. And you accept the consequences of those
choices. Whether for accolades or rebuke or somewhere in between.
However, in this context you are also attempting to represent a larger
community. You are attempting to represent and market Smalltalk and
Pharo. There are many here who are a part of that community will also
bear the consequences of words chosen by members of this community.
To my understanding all that is being asked is. Look at the big picture.
Choose your words, handles, labels wisely.
Is it politically correct or intellectually dishonest to call you Richard?
Can you not be intellectually and artistically honest and choose words
for who you are and who you are writing to and for?
Are there no other handles which are just as appropriate for you but are
better in this context?
I think it can often be just as intellectually dishonest to say,
"tough", "deal with it". I like these words and I do not want to make an
effort to choose others.
It is not the English language that constrains.
Regarding Paris. My heart and prayers go out to the people of France.
You are not writing political satire. You are attempting to make certain
technical, business, policy, ... arguments to market the adoption of
Smalltalk and Pharo.
You are not being attacked at all. You are simply being advised of
consequences to certain choices.
Choose. Choose well. For the consequences good or bad, are yours.
Jimmie
On 1/18/2015 10:16 AM, horrido wrote:
This is a fine line to tread. I have several problems with self-censorship:
First of all, "Generalissimo" is just a handle. My previous handle,
"horrido", was surely objectionable as well, since it's a play on the battle
cry associated with the WWII German Luftwaffe ( Horrido: Fighter Aces of the
Luftwaffe
<http://www.amazon.ca/Horrido-Luftwaffe-Raymond-F-Toliver/dp/0553126636> ).
I admit to being a WWII buff. I have been for many years. Should I apologize
for this?
Second, I am firmly and philosophically opposed to Political Correctness. I
find it intellectually offensive to my very core. I guess that would make me
a lousy politician.
One thing that no one can accuse me of is being intellectually dishonest.
Third, my self-censorship is hardly different from what Muslim terrorists
were trying to achieve in Paris last week. Free expression should be
protected (as long as it is not foul or vulgar). Any language you use will
offend /someone somewhere/ at /some time/ in the world. I try to be sensible
and I try to be artistically honest. This is reflected in my writings. There
will always be people who find my style distasteful. There isn't much I can
do about that.
sebast...@flowingconcept.com wrote
Sometimes you want to polarise people but there is nothing interesting as
output of this particular one, please consider review that inner joke
Richard
So I agree, that this particular vocabulary will polarise people in an
inconvenient way.
On Jan 18, 2015, at 6:30 AM,
jtuchel@
wrote:
Horrido,
You are aware that there are regions on this planet where mails
containing vocabulary like Blitzkrieg or Genaralissimo will evoke
reactions that will not help at ll. You are at risk to simply be ignored
in the best case. In the worst case, people will hsake their heads and
associate Smalltalk with a certain kind of political spam they receive
from time to time.
Joachim
Von: horrido <mailto:
horrido.hobbies@
>
Gesendet: Samstag, 17. Januar 2015 16:15
An: Any question about pharo is welcome <mailto:
pharo-users@.pharo
>
http://horridohobbies.tumblr.com/
<http://horridohobbies.tumblr.com/>
*Today is the one-month anniversary of the SRP.* We have made good
progress,
but there is still much work ahead of us.
Shortly, I will be seeking corporate sponsorship. As well, I'm trying to
coordinate activities with the Smalltalk Foundation.
Later this summer, I will be pushing my "Small Minds Initiative," a
sub-campaign of the SRP to get Smalltalk into the classroom. I will begin
with the Toronto District School Board.
Are we pumped yet?!
Generalissimo
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Blitzkrieg-tp4800165.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Blitzkrieg-tp4800165p4800229.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
