2015-03-10 14:13 GMT+01:00 Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com>:

>
>
>
>
>>
>> 2015-03-10 13:27 GMT+01:00 Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Joachim Tuchel <jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> #doWithIndex: ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> doWithIndex: elementAndIndexBlock
>>> "Use the new version with consistent naming"
>>> ^ self withIndexDo: elementAndIndexBlock
>>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Thierry Goubier <
> thierry.goub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And one has to guess that elementAndIndexBlock means
>>
>> [:each :i | ... ] ? (and of course not [:i :each | ... ] )
>>
>
> The Principle Of Least Surprise would imply that the variables appear in
> the same order that they appear in the method name. Of course that doesn't
> mean you don't get surprised sometimes.  Are there any that don't follow
> that rule?  We should consider fixing them.
>

In Pharo 4. GLMTableColumn>>#modifiedBlock: anObject.

I tried to follow the trail and it's a three arguments block, according to
GLMTreeMorphNodeModel>>#rowMorphForColumn: , since we see:

aGlamourColumn modifiedBlock cull: contentMorph text cull: self item cull:
self containerTree glamourPresentation

Following senders, I have

GLMTablePresentation>>column: aBlockOrString evaluated: aBlock modified:
aModifiedBlock,

(still no documentation)

and:

GTObjectVariablesBrowser>>variablesIn: composite

where I find:

column: 'Value'
evaluated: [:assoc | GTObjectPrinter new asTruncatedTextFrom: assoc value ]
modified: [:newValue :assoc :presentation |
self updateInstanceVariable: assoc key from: presentation entity basedOn:
newValue.
presentation update ];

Now, I know :)

A good experience: use a finder or spotter, search for senders of
cull:cull:cull:. I choose the first one I found for the example above (I
have a memory of some which were annoying, in Morphic or Spec, but couldn't
remember which ones).

  It would be interesting if something like autocompletion could supply the
> template for the block.
>

Ouch. It would not be easy, but possible. A pragma ? ;)

Thierry

Reply via email to