once more I really dont like idea of methods returning single values. This also one of the reasons why Spec annoys me. Why not have Collection / Dictionary that stores all these strings ? Having 100 methods for 100 icons seems really ugly . Instead one collection with 100 entries and a single method would be more than enough.
I know its not just you that do this and is how icons work in Pharo .Its basically how many things work like this inside Pharo. But I still dont get it.... why ? On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Aha, of course. > The program makes assumptions about the file name and since it is naming > the method like the file it fails, because you can't have "-" in method > name. > I could change it so it removes all non-alphanumeric characters from the > name. > > Peter > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:52 PM, kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I found the problem >> >> "Norse_largeThe '-' prefix works only for literal numbers (use #negated >> instead) -> -cpcIconContents >> "Private - Method generated with the content of the file File @ >> /Users/kilon/Downloads/Norse_large-cpc.png"" >> >> looks like it does not like that i use "-" inside the file name. In the >> folder the name of the file is not Norse_large-cpc.png but >> Norse-large-cpc.png >> >> "-" has some special meaning here ? >> >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> create file ? i thought the class only creates methods >>>> >>> yeah, I mean method >>> >>>> >>>> anyway, the method is created , but it does not proceed to next png. >>>> Shouldn create a method for each png it finds in the directory ? >>>> >>> yes it should, it operates on a collection, so if >>> dir allFiles select: [ :each | each extension = 'png' ] >>> shows more then one file it should also create a method for each one, >>> not just the first >>> >>> Peter >>> >> >> >
