Le 13 avr. 2015 à 17:06, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :

> ZnUrl>>#file and ZnUrl>>#directory are not well specified I guess, and maybe 
> not that useful, but since these partially fall back to #path I am afraid you 
> cannot just change them.

Yes, I just noticed that.

> I would convert to a FileReference as in
> 
>  (ZnUrl fromString: 'file:///tmp/') asFileReference.
> 
> In short, ZnUrl is not really meant for file path manipulation.

Ok, good to know.

> BTW, there is a way to get what you expect
> 
>  (ZnUrl fromString: 'file:////tmp/') pathPrintString.
> 
> Now, if you find a good solution, that does not break anything else and works 
> for all schemes, I would be interested.

ZnUrl>>#directory has no "real" senders. (some tests and examples)
Maybe as suggested by Doru, it should be removed and instead use a File 
reference?

Thanks for the reply.

> 
>> On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:43, Christophe Demarey <christophe.dema...@inria.fr> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I just tried to evaluate:
>>      (ZnUrl fromString: 'file:///tmp/') directory 
>> and got 'tmp/' as result.
>> 
>> I'm a bit suprised. Shouldn't it be '/tmp/' ?
>> Be fore trying to fix I would like to be sure what is the expected behavior.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Christophe.
> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to