On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Peter Uhnak <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/07, Alejandro Infante wrote: >> Hi, >> It is really difficult to help you just with a profile and without looking >> at your code. >> Even though, I have noticed that most of the time is used on calculating >> properties related to CompositeShapes (like position and encompassing >> rectangle). >> >> Would be possible for you to run the same code but replacing the >> CompositeShape by another less complex shape (like RTBox)? >> If this new experiment is fast, then the problem would be those 2 properties >> (position and encompassing rectangle) are too expensive, and therefore we >> should think how to optimize that code. >> >> I know that ForceLayout is not the fastest layout, but 59 seconds is too >> much for just 13 elements. > > The complexity should be nlog(n) per iteration. > For such small diagram this should be pretty much instant. > > However from the profiler I can see that a _lot_ of time is spent in > calculating the label size, which definitely shouldn't be this slow...
I had this problem with labels a while a go in Rossal 1 when using Unicode in a label. https://github.com/moosetechnology/moose/issues/898 >From memory it came down to calculating the width of a unicode string. I think I hacked it in the rendering loop, such that the string width is cached along with a copy of the string. Next iteration if the string was the same return the cached value, otherwise recalculate. I think I discounted resetting the cache to nil when setting the label string due to inter thread races. cheers -ben > > If you want to look at the other layouts, look at this > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31543901/AgileVisualization/Layout/0106-Layout.html > >> >> Cheers, >> Alejandro >> >> > On Dec 7, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Pablo Polanco <parop...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, we are Pablo Polanco and Jorge Ampuero and we are Computer Science >> > students at Universidad de Chile. >> > >> > We are currently taking a course on Robotics Software Engineering dictated >> > by Johan Fabry. >> > >> > We want to visualize a simple directed graph and we are experiencing >> > performance issues when layouting our visualization in Roassal. >> > >> > We provide the report from the Time Profiler when we visualize 13 elements >> > and 38 edges: http://pastebin.com/zsh8YFPx <http://pastebin.com/zsh8YFPx> >> > >> > Should it take so much time? How could we improve it? Is there another >> > more appropriate layout? >> > >> > Thanks in advance :) >> > >> > <Screenshot from 2015-12-07 17:23:05.png> >> > >> > > -- > Peter >