Hi,

> On 27 Jan 2016, at 23:38, Jimmie Houchin <jlhouc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Another surprise.
> 
> ./pharo Pharo.image update
> 
> blows up. Both in the stable 4 and 5 and latest (alpha) versions. On the 
> Pharo 4 version it maxed at 1gb ram and the Pharo 5 versions maxed at 3.8gb 
> ram and both maxed out a cpu thread. The Pharo4 version never quit, I had to 
> kill. The Pharo5 version core dumped.
> 
> Just wanted to let you know.

yes, we are aware. 
but that’s not a problem of the command line tools but the update process: it 
is broken since ages and IMO, we should just remove it (at least hide it).

Esteban

> 
> Shalom Aleichem
> 
> Jimmie
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 01/27/2016 12:59 PM, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I am reading the Deep Into Pharo book. I have been playing with the 
>> CommandLineHandler. I have been surprised by some of its behavior. Though I 
>> have used Pharo a long time. I have not played with it from the command 
>> line. I am a very long time Linux user and am very comfortable on the 
>> command line.
>> 
>> When according to the book I execute:
>> 
>> ./pharo Pharo.image --list
>> 
>> It will provide me with a list of the available handlers.
>> 
>> I did not expect it to open up an image for me. That is not what I expected 
>> or wanted. I did not intend to use an image at this time. I am on the 
>> command line and expecting to see results there. Not for a new window to pop 
>> up.
>> 
>> As of yet I have always opened up Pharo on the command line. I have yet to 
>> use PharoLauncher, but do intend to do so soon. So I am comfortable with  
>> Pharo opening up a new window and image from the command line.
>> 
>> However it is very unintuitive and seemingly unnecessary to open up an image 
>> for these command line handlers. I naively think they should simply return 
>> the results. Now if that requires opening a headless image for a moment and 
>> close, then fine.
>> 
>> --list
>> --help
>> --version
>> --copyright
>> eval
>> printVersion
>> 
>> Some other handlers I do not know if opening an image is the correct 
>> default. I have not spent the time learning them yet.
>> 
>> Thanks.  Shalom Aleichem.
>> 
>> Jimmie
> 
> 


Reply via email to