Finally it's not working. Yesterday, when I opened it, it was working and this morning, when i tried, it was not working. So there is no solution. And I'm not the only one to have this problem. Because I've tried in an other computer, and it was exactly the same. I was looking on tasks management and in details I have the application Pharo.exe running even when I restart the computer. When I want to stop the task, it said me : "The transaction could not be completed. Access denied". I dont know what to do more...
Thanks in advance, Justine 2016-02-01 23:39 GMT+01:00 Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com>: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Justine STIENNE > <justine.stie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you everybody. Now it's working :-) > > Cool. Can you report the solution to help the next person that might > be stuck by the same thing? > cheers -ben > > > > > Justine > > > > 2016-02-01 17:55 GMT+01:00 Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com>: > >> > >> >> To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org > >> >> From: step...@stack.nl > >> >> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 20:27:37 +0100 > >> >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Problem to open Pharo 50 on Windows > >> >> > >> >> On 31-01-16 18:55, Franck Warlouzet wrote: > >> >> > I tried to help Justine a bit, but I have the same OS, the same VM, > >> >> > the > >> >> > same image, the same sources and it works for me but not for her, > >> >> > >> >> Which OS & update version, in what directories is it installed? > >> >> > >> >> Stephan > >> > >> > >> > On 31 Jan 2016, at 22:05, Franck Warlouzet < > franck.warlou...@hotmail.fr> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > For my case, windows 10, latest I assume. Installed on the desktop (in > >> > several directories, I'm organized). > >> > > >> > Do you think it could be an admin rights issue if it is installed in > >> > protected directories in Justine's case ? > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > it has to be… otherwise I cannot imagine what it can be :( > >> > >> One thing to consider... if the Image was installed into a protected > >> folder by an administrator, and then opened and then saved by a > >> standard-user, Windows presents *very* strange and *misleading* > >> behaviour, > >> which I describe here... > >> > >> > http://forum.world.st/FEEDBACK-Install-Pharo-on-Windows-td4733900.html#a4740803 > >> > >> Basically, the files installed into Window's protected folders *must* > >> be read only, or all hell breaks loose :). When the standard-user > >> tries to write to Pharo.image in the protected folder, Windows (ever > >> soooo helpful) doesn't complain but *silently* takes a shadow copy of > >> the protected folder into the standard-user's folder which can be > >> written to. It then *transparently* makes it seem like the file in the > >> original location was updated, for that user. The same happens for > >> other users so that for a single file location (e.g. > >> "C:\..\protected\Pharo.image") each user sees different data. > >> > >> Should the original file be *really* updated by an administrator > >> installing an upgrade, the standard-users don't see the change. They > >> still see only their own custom unique shadow version of Pharo.image. > >> This is really *evil* behaviour, so its good to share from this info > >> from time to time, even if its not the cause in this case. > >> > >> btw, you can easily confirm this yourself just using notepad to edit a > >> protected txt file while switching a few times between Admin and > >> Standard-User accounts. Some things have to be seen to be believed. > >> > >> cheers -ben > >> > > > >
