> On Apr 12, 2016, at 10:51, Alistair Grant <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:02:52PM +0200, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>> Thank you. I was talking about your experience with Pharo :-)
>> But your description is nice also.
> 
> Ahh, right, sorry about that.
> 
> Pharo 5.0 first impressions from someone coming from VW2.5...
> 
> I'm already a fan of Smalltalk and its development environment.  I've
> only spent a few hours working with Pharo (it's my hobby, with not
> nearly as much time as I would like):
> 
> * I read the first few chapters of Pharo by Example as an introduction
>  to Pharo.
> * The browser, debugger and basic inspectors are all familiar enough
>  that I was able to work with them without any issues.
> * I'm glad that being able to run headless mode is easy, as I'd like to
>  use Pharo for scripting.
> * The addition of Montacello / Metacello / Gofer and SUnit are the
>  biggest improvements I've noticed so far.  I wish I had these 20 years
>  ago.
> * I've only played with the MessageFlow Browser a little, but I think it
>  will be one of my go-to tools.
> * I'm still getting used to the idea of the entire ST environment being
>  in a single OS window, but at the moment I think I prefer VW's
>  approach where each ST window is a OS window, as it makes it easier to
>  work with other applications, e.g. if I want to look at an email or
>  web page while working within ST.
> 
> I only have one suggested improvement so far (assuming it doesn't
> already exist and I just haven't found it yet)...  When searching for
> packages on SqueakSource / SmalltalkHub etc.  it isn't clear to me how
> much confidence I can have in any given package, which is really useful
> if there are multiple packages providing similar functionality.
> 
> The Arch Linux model seems pretty good to me.  Official packages are in
> the core or extra repositories, which matches what is included in the
> Pharo image.  The next level is a community repository, which contains
> packages maintained by Trusted Users.  General users can be confident
> that these packages will be kept up to date.  The last level is the User
> Repository (AUR), which anyone can contribute to.  The AUR includes a
> comment section and vote count, and general users can add or remove
> their vote.

I'd like to see something like this too.

> 
> Hope I haven't ruffled too many feathers...
> 
> Thanks!
> Alistair
> 

Reply via email to