> On 05 Sep 2016, at 18:24, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote >> Could you write your #title accessor then as > > That's what I ended up doing :)
OK. > I just wondered if there was a better way. > Thinking out loud, is there any harm in the added flexibility of passing the > object-in-progress as well as the string to the converter via #cull:cull:? I guess it would be slower. > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/NeoCSV-Interdependent-Field-tp4914190p4914206.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
