Humm, why not? When I load the configuration it loads several other packages, wouldn't that need a cleanup too? When I first see that I could cleanup an image my first thought was to put it in a production state with my code, then I would cleanup to leave it as lean as possible. Isn't that correct?
If I should not clean after load my packages why provide the functionality? Why not provide clean images to be used in production so that people could download and load it's ready to production code? Regards, Vitor On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I think it is not really realistic to expect this to work *after* loading > code of others. > > Why not > > -> do image clean > -> *then* load the packages you need? > > Marcus > > On 13 Sep 2016, at 03:19, Vitor Medina Cruz <vitormc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ok, I did some extra tests and I think I figured what is happening: the > code I load on the image subject to clean has a startUp method that starts > a Teapot server on port 8080. I tried various scenarios: > > 1- Load a fresh image from get.pharo.org and execute clean --> Ok > 2- Load a fresh image from get.pharo.org only with the dependencies from > my project (ConfigurationOfTwitterChallenge), one at a time, and execute > clean --> Ok > 3- Load a fresh image from get.pharo.org, apply > ConfigurationOfTwitterChallenge and execute clean --> Fail > 4- Load a fresh image from get.pharo.org, apply > ConfigurationOfTwitterChallenge and execute eval "TwitterChallengeMain > stopDefaultExecution. ImageCleaner cleanUpForProduction. Smalltalk > snapshot: true andQuit: true." --> *Ok *(Assuming ImageCleaner > cleanUpForProduction. Smalltalk snapshot: true andQuit: true. does the same > as clean --production) > > It appears I cannot clean an Image with the server started. Question: is > that an error or I really should not try to clean an image with a server > on? If the former I open an issue on FogBuz and I will try on a > not-headless vm to see if some error happen. > > Regards, > Vitor > > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:59 AM, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: > >> Ok may be this is just an endless loop :) >> >> >> >> Le 12/9/16 à 10:22, Marcus Denker a écrit : >> >> Hello, >> >> Yes, this is a bug that we really need to fix. >> (sadly no information to add other thant that). >> >> On 09 Sep 2016, at 15:16, Vitor Medina Cruz <vitormc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Isn't cleanup the headless image working right now? I know it has some >> problems, but I tried to: >> >> curl get.pharo.org | bash >> ./pharo Pharo.image clean --production >> >> It runs for hours and don't complete. Last time I leave it for about 5 >> hours before I cancelled. >> >> Regards, >> Vitor >> >> >> >> > >
