Am 16.10.2016 14:35 schrieb "CodeDmitry" <dimamakh...@gmail.com>:
> I define Magic as "An opaque abstraction or an abstraction you think is
> opaque until you learn better.", to a beginner, everything is deeply
> That said, much of Smalltalk's opaqueness is not due to the language, but
> due to me being a beginner. I'm sure there's a way to actually force
> a message to a dictionary via something like dict['at:put:']('foo', 'bar')
> but I am not familiar enough with Smalltalk to express it, so it feels
> the only way to send a message is via this multi-part message abstraction.
You can always access the method dict directly to get a method and call
or perform with arguments.
> View this message in context:
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.