Yes, a +1 on the assessment of the paper. The research methodology does not
really result in any representative or generalisable data, so the conclusions
(I have no experience with the journal, but my gut tells me to stay away from
Does this mail seem too brief? Sorry for that, I don’t mean to be rude! Please
see http://emailcharter.org .
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of
> On 01 Dec 2016, at 12:56, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For me this paper is crappy and this kind of journal not really good.
> So I'm not surprised,