Yes, a +1 on the assessment of the paper. The research methodology does not 
really result in any representative or generalisable data, so the conclusions 
are unfounded. 

(I have no experience with the journal, but my gut tells me to stay away from 

Does this mail seem too brief? Sorry for that, I don’t mean to be rude! Please 
see .

Johan Fabry   -
PLEIAD and RyCh labs  -  Computer Science Department (DCC)  -  University of 

> On 01 Dec 2016, at 12:56, Serge Stinckwich <> wrote:
> For me this paper is crappy and this kind of journal not really good.
> So I'm not surprised,

Reply via email to