Yes, a +1 on the assessment of the paper. The research methodology does not really result in any representative or generalisable data, so the conclusions are unfounded.
(I have no experience with the journal, but my gut tells me to stay away from it.) -- Does this mail seem too brief? Sorry for that, I don’t mean to be rude! Please see http://emailcharter.org . Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile > On 01 Dec 2016, at 12:56, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For me this paper is crappy and this kind of journal not really good. > So I'm not surprised,
