> On 5 Dec 2016, at 19:10, Holger Freyther <hol...@freyther.de> wrote: > > >> On 05 Dec 2016, at 13:03, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > > Dear Denis, > > >> It was fixed here 16877 and here 19108. (last allows interrupt in such cases) > > is this in Pharo5 or will it show up in Pharo5? >
These are good candidates for back porting. I will put it on my TODO.
Marcus
