I tried that tack. I said Pharo is only 8 years old, but some people come back and tell me that Pharo is still essentially Smalltalk. It's hard for me to disagree.
Richard On 1 January 2017 at 11:27, stepharong <stephar...@free.fr> wrote: > Since people believe that new equals better, we market Pharo as new. > And Pharo is new and it will continue to improve so this is not even a lie > :) > > There is a reason why we decided to go that road and avoid to always say > to people that we use a language > designed nearly 40 years ago. > > But you can try :) > > Stef > > > > On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 14:05:12 +0100, horrido <horrido.hobb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Wow! *In just one day*, the Slashdot story added another thousand pageviews >> to my TechBeacon article! >> >> However, if you look at the comments, there's an awful lot of disdain for >> Smalltalk. It appears that Slashdot is inhabited by a lot of ignorant and >> opinionated programmers. I did not realize this. >> >> I'm trying to respond to the negative comments, but it's getting >> overwhelming... >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Slashdot >> -Submission-tp4928235p4928493.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- > Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >
