Hi,

I am not quite sure I understand your problem, but I believe what you want is 
to only react to a change in a text.

This information is placed in the #text port. Here is a basic example of how to 
react to it:
http://ws.stfx.eu/ETEC2JH7363M

Cheers,
Doru


> On Feb 6, 2017, at 2:16 AM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> For my Grafoscopio notebooks,  I have implemented a way to auto-updating the 
> content of a node, so it is automatically saved in the notebook when a node 
> content is changed. The problem is that a node contains an embedded 
> playground that produces text as output when executed (for example the 
> playground reads a file or scraps HTML or calculates a hash), the text of the 
> playground is replaced with the executed output. If the playground produces a 
> visualization or non-textual output, this doesn't happen.
> 
> I imagine that the source of the problem is here:
> 
> =======
> 
> GrafoscopioNotebook >> autoSaveBodyOf: aNode
>    body body class = TextModel
>        ifTrue: [ body body whenTextChanged: [ :arg | aNode body: arg ] ].
>    body body class = GlamourPresentationModel
>        ifTrue: [ | playground |
>            playground := body body glmPres.
>            playground
>                when: GLMContextChanged
>                do: [ :ann |
>                    ann property = #text
>                        ifTrue: [ | playgroundText |
>                            playgroundText := (playground pane ports at: 2) 
> value.
>                            aNode body: playgroundText ]
>                ]
>        ]
> 
> =======
> 
> as you can see the "when: GLMContextChanged" updates a node body with the 
> playgroundText, as intended, so I can capture any change of the playground 
> code, but I would like to add some condition to **not** update the body 
> content if the text is the result of a playground execution. There is any way 
> to do this?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Offray
> 
> 

--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com

"If you can't say why something is relevant, 
it probably isn't."


Reply via email to