> > Which is why last month I joined the Association. I felt I needed to make > the commitment. I had thought I wanted to do BountySource on a monthly > basis. I signed up at the Association level but nothing happened with > regarding to any membership. So I went ahead and did the Annual fee. But I > do like the idea of monthly support. So I may do that again anyway.
Excellent. I always said that the structure make us, individuals, more powerful. The consortium is also a good structure for the same reason: as a sme 1000 Euros brings nothing but when there are 50 sme, we get one engineer. > > I would love to see the monthly support via BountySource or directly to the > Association whichever is best for you to grow and help sustainability. Marcus knows everything and me nothing about the setup :) > I have also been thinking about ways to contribute of my time. I am looking > at how I can help with documentation type areas. Yes this is great. > The team that contributes toward Pharo is amazing, especially considering > the size. Tx. But you see there are many external contributors and they get an impact. > Again thanks. > > Jimmie > > > > On 07/22/2017 05:04 AM, Stephane Ducasse wrote: >> >> Thanks Jimmie. Do not hesitate to improve Pharo, because Pharo is what >> we have and each we can make it better. >> BTW: it was not my roadmap it is the result of everybody in the team >> brainstorming. > > > [snip] >
