I would very much like this path. What would constitute tiny?
> On Aug 11, 2017, at 9:10 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11 Aug 2017, at 18:57, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Another step would be to get a minimal parser not relying on
> Let’s think differently: why not to include a tiny PetitParser?
> Then we can think on:
> - pillar sintax (better than just a restricted version)
> - simplify other “small parsers” that are already on the image.
> - we provide a tool to o cool stuff (instead relying as always in regexp,
"Beauty is where we see it."