Thank you for the answers! I thought ODBC was deprecated from Garage, I'll
give it another look.

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sattler <tomsatt...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have no problem using Garage to connect to Postgres.  Don't know if it
> will work with DB2, but since it's ODBC, it should.
>
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Andrei Stebakov <lisper...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stef
>>
>> I already checked Garage, it doesn't have support for DB2. It used to
>> have support for odbc, but now it's deprecated.
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> On Dec 22, 2017 15:11, "Stephane Ducasse" <stepharo.s...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi andrei
>>>
>>> I do not know the status of OBDC but you should know that code on
>>> squeaksource is in general quite old.
>>> Have a look at Garage which is a kind of JBDC.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/pharo-rdbms/garage
>>>
>>> You should probably have a version available via the catalog
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Andrei Stebakov <lisper...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Stef
>>> >
>>> > Gofer new
>>> >   squeaksource: 'ODBC';
>>> >   package: 'ConfigurationOfODBC'; load.
>>> >   (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfODBC) load.
>>> >
>>> > When I execute the code above I got an exception doesNotUnderstand:
>>> > #selector in RBParser>>externalFunctionDeclaration. Looks like
>>> currentScope
>>> > variable is not defined.
>>> > Also if I install ODBC from the catalog it also fails.
>>> >
>>> > Andrei
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Stephane Ducasse <
>>> stepharo.s...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi andrei
>>> >>
>>> >> First welcome to this list.
>>> >> Second can you explain to us what is the experience that you did so
>>> >> that you can state that ODBC is broken in Pharo 6.1?
>>> >>
>>> >> Stef
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Andrei Stebakov <
>>> lisper...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > Looks like ODBC is broken in Pharo 6.1.
>>> >> > What's the best way to get access to DB2 in Pharo?
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to