> Am 07.06.2018 um 21:18 schrieb Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]>:
> 
> On 07/06/2018 13:59, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>>> On 7 Jun 2018, at 14:42, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> And safer. The current implementation of NeoJSONObject is not ver good. It 
>>> returns nil on any missing key so you mask a lot of errors in your code 
>>> which I find dangerous.
>> 
>> Haha, it was modelled after a JavaScript object, of course it is worse, but 
>> more convenient in scripting code.
>> Sure, a plain Dictionary is better.
> 
> Nothing that syntax sugar mapping some convenient property accessor to
> #at: couldn't fix. :)
> 
> 
If you come this point you should realize that you need to have a domain object 
instead

Reply via email to