Hi guys - I got build 1072 using Pharo Launcher (I like to know what build I’m 
using - but maybe I should pick stable and just date stamp my image?)

Anyway just tried the latest 1077 and followed the steps I described (although 
using my caught up branch)  - when I right click on the detached pharo  - there 
is the Pharo menu item and inside that there is only the option to create a new 
branch for an issue?

Am I missing something (or is this something recently broken?)

Tim

> On 19 Jun 2018, at 14:35, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Strange... I'm with Esteban there, I'd need more information to reproduce it.
> I've just done
> 
> $ wget -O - get.pharo.org/70+vm <http://get.pharo.org/70+vm> | bash
> $ ./pharo-ui Pharo.image
> 
> - Open iceberg
> - Repair Pharo by cloning my (really out of date) fork (guillep/pharo)
> - Fetch
> - Repair -> Create branch
> 
> And I have the "New branch" option.
> 
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:28 PM Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:esteba...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 19 Jun 2018, at 15:18, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works 
>> <mailto:tim@testit.works>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Guillermo - it sounds like I’m on the right track - the only thing that 
>> caught me out was in the latest V7 there is no “new branch” - I have to have 
>> an issue number? The picture in your doc shows both possibilities?
> 
> how did you arrive there?
> seems to me that there should always be the opportunity of just branch. If 
> not, may be there is an error.
> 
> Esteban
> 
>> 
>> For now, I found a bug and created an issue, and so can experiment with that 
>> - but I think it is handy to create a generic branch so that you can 
>> experiment (while easily tracking your changes)?
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>>> On 19 Jun 2018, at 14:01, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:guillermopol...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:26 PM Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works 
>>> <mailto:tim@testit.works>> wrote:
>>> Hi - a few weeks ago, I contributed a tiny fix to Pharo 7 -and the 
>>> instructions seemed to work really well.
>>> 
>>> I’ve since come back to try and do some more over lunch (I was thinking I’d 
>>> like to dig out the changes I worked out for using the AST and cursor to 
>>> make senders/implements work properly and not just use the selected text).
>>> 
>>> My first problem was that my fork of Pharo from many months ago was out of 
>>> date - I think the instructions on 
>>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/wiki/Contribute-a-fix-to-Pharo 
>>> <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/wiki/Contribute-a-fix-to-Pharo> 
>>> should probably mention this subtlety.
>>> 
>>> It took me ages to figure out what to do - this was the clue 
>>> (https://help.github.com/articles/syncing-a-fork/ 
>>> <https://help.github.com/articles/syncing-a-fork/>) - and of particular 
>>> note the the tiny bit at the bottom to ensure you Push your changes back to 
>>> your GitHub fork (I slightly complicated myself by using IntelliJ to do 
>>> this - doable but you need to be aware of whats going on). I did this in a 
>>> separate non-pharo directory (I think thats what you would recommend right? 
>>> Then you can keep updating it from time to time?)
>>> 
>>> Usually, you don't care. You don't need to update your fork :)
>>> You only need to:
>>>  - clone/locate your repository in disk
>>>  - fetch (this will find your commit in the pharo repository)
>>>  - create a new branch X
>>>  - push branch X to your fork
>>>  - make a pull request
>>> 
>>> The contribution process never goes through master nor development, so it 
>>> does not really matter if they are updated.
>>> And that's what I was showing in my videos because there is nothing else to 
>>> it :)
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Having got my GitHub fork caught up with pharo/development - I then have 
>>> the Local Repo Missing error (expected) - and now when I go to repair it I 
>>> can either clone again (which is the instructions online) - or “Locate this 
>>> repository in your file system”. As I’ve had to already check everything 
>>> out to catch up to pharo/dev I chose to locate.
>>> 
>>> I then get a Fetch require msg (expected)
>>> 
>>> I then choose to use Fetch (I’m not sure what the Repair repository picture 
>>> is now about?) - the text does mention I will become detached, so I’ve 
>>> stuck to that
>>> 
>>> I’m not sure why the “solving a detached working copy” is further down the 
>>> page - but I’ve jumped to that
>>> 
>>> It says I need to synchronise both (image and repo) - but then says its 
>>> easier to do a branch - and then says a nice alternative is to create a 
>>> temp branch like temp/synch - however I can’t see how to do that as there 
>>> is only Crete new Branch from Issue now (the picture shows that plus New 
>>> Branch).
>>> 
>>> I don't see what's the problem, maybe the UI can be enhanced to be more 
>>> explicit.
>>> But you can just select "New branch" and create a branch with any name.
>>> 
>>> I'll go a bit deeper here:
>>>  - you just downloaded a new image that was built from commit 100
>>>  - In the meantime, while you downloaded your image, a new PR would have 
>>> been integrated in pharo, so now the development branch may not be anymore 
>>> on commit 100 but on commit 101.
>>>  - Even worse! There is no branch at all pointing to 100, your image's 
>>> commit
>>>  - So the safest way to work (because updating the image may be dangerous 
>>> not because of Iceberg :)) is to create a new branch on your commit.
>>> 
>>> However, while this is the recommended way to work on Pharo, on other 
>>> projects you can do a more normal workflow: checkout, pull.
>>> 
>>> Does this answer it? Maybe I've missed something?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Am I on the right track here? If I want try something out - do I just 
>>> create myself a new issue (or is there a temp issue anyway?)
>>> 
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>>    
>>> Guille Polito
>>> Research Engineer
>>> 
>>> Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
>>> CRIStAL - UMR 9189
>>> French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr 
>>> <http://www.cnrs.fr/>
>>> 
>>> Web: http://guillep.github.io <http://guillep.github.io/>
>>> Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>    
> Guille Polito
> Research Engineer
> 
> Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
> CRIStAL - UMR 9189
> French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr 
> <http://www.cnrs.fr/>
> 
> Web: http://guillep.github.io <http://guillep.github.io/>
> Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13

Reply via email to