I am looking at porting my missing class creation code into Pharo 7, and I notice there is a DynamicMessageImplementor that does this for methods - but I’m wondering why when we create a missing method with ‘self souldBeImplemented.’ with a trailing “.”?
The Smalltalk style guide normally says the last statement shouldn’t have a dot - and I notice some recent cleanups removed some dots on methods (presumably the formatter). This is a bit of a special case as the intent is to replace that method - but shouldn’t we create without the dot to set a good example anyway? If so, I can include that change in my pr. Tim
