> Am 11.10.2018 um 14:24 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: > > > >> On 11 Oct 2018, at 14:21, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com >> <mailto:b...@openinworld.com>> wrote: >> >> So this is more a problem for repos that have lived a long time already on >> github? >> It guess it should impede someone using their account as a staging point for >> migrating from Smalltalkhub projects to a community github repo. >> >> Although an alternate way to consider this is that the forwarding submerges >> a problem to be forgotten until it causes a mystery problem later on. >> Forking the repo back into your account and deleting the "master" branch >> might be fail-fast way to expose and fix issues. >> (emphasis on the "might" - I'm not sure of all the trade-offs) >> >> cheers -ben >> >> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 14:36, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name >> <mailto:norb...@hartl.name>> wrote: >> Well, you can but then the access is not forwarded anymore to the repo >> you‘ve transferred. Transferring and forking makes everyone link something >> they maybe don‘t want. Transferring and creating a new one with the same >> name brings all request to the former to your new repo which is unlikely to >> be wanted. > > Yes, but you can :)
Dude, you need to write that in channel #nitpick Oh, there is no channel with that name? Never mind! > And if someone points to you copy, he will still have it (just with the > possibility of not fetching an updated version). > > But he can always fix that by adding the new remote and pulling from there :) > I’m not talking about the ability of us. I’m pretty sure everyone can grasp that. I’m talking about invisible change with side effect. I care about such things :P Norbert > Esteban > >> >> Norbert >> >> > Am 11.10.2018 um 07:49 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:esteba...@gmail.com>>: >> > >> > Why not? >> > >> >> On 10 Oct 2018, at 17:55, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name >> >> <mailto:norb...@hartl.name>> wrote: >> >> >> >> No, that you cannot >> >> >> >>> Am 10.10.2018 um 16:36 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com >> >>> <mailto:s...@clipperadams.com>>: >> >>> >> >>> NorbertHartl wrote >> >>>> The rest is provided by github as long as you do not create a new >> >>>> repository with the same name. >> >>> >> >>> Can you still fork the transferred repo in your personal account? I >> >>> wasn't >> >>> sure, which is why I didn't handle Artefact this way. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ----- >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> Sean >> >>> -- >> >>> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >> >>> <http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >
