"first we are not good in math" First, I am not criticising YOU. Pharo's weird ScaledDecimal is Squeak's weird ScaledDecimal and you have not changed it. Fine. "second Pharo is what we have and we never said that it is the best system ever" True, but irrelevant. "third I never saw a piece of code from you" That is not true. Why, in this thread alone I contributed #roundOut. I have provided several pieces of code in this mailing list over the years. You can say that my code is no good, or that you don't want it, or that you think there is a better way to do the (admittedly small) things that I have provided, but if you never saw them you must have shut your eyes. In addition, a snapshot of my system is available on the web for anyone to play with. I shall post here when my GitHub repository is populated; I just have to clear a few more things out of the local directory that I don't have the right to distribute. (For example, benchmarking my CSV library against NeoCSV meant having to have NeoCSV, but it's not mine to distribute.)
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 08:45, ducasse <steph...@netcourrier.com> wrote: > > Richard > > As I said it thousands of times, > - first we are not good in math > - second Pharo is what we have and we never said that it is the best > system ever > we just enhanced daily > - third, I never saw a piece of code from you. > - if you want to see Pharo improve (which I doubt about) just send us > code and tests > > I’m sad that you systematically ignore any of my emails on the topic. > You could have an impact but you prefer to hide yourselves in your tower. > Good luck with it. > > S.
