No problem, It's much better to do it this way :)
I will try to be online as much as possible this weekend, and I still have my rather larger private image collection to test use cases on. Regards, Bas On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 16:04 +0200, Stani wrote: > Hi Bas, > > That would be really great, but unfortunately it is too late to > include non-tested core features such as multiprocessing. The last > weeks we have been working very intensely to fix as much bugs as we > can, which we discovered thanks to Nadia's test suite. The rules for > Ubuntu are very strict. In fact we are two weeks too late (the last > karmic alpha has been released already). Due to previous good > experience with Phatch, they probably will grant me a Feature Freeze > exception to include Phatch in Karmic. It is not obvious at all and I > don't want to take any risk. > > That said, I would really appreciate that you work on it anyway so we > can include it an 0.2.x update or 0.3. After Karmic we will work as > well on the Windows version and Mac version. If your implementation > proofs stable by than we can include it. > > In case you have some extra time before monday, feel free on irc to > offer yourself. Maybe you could help testing or fixing some bugs. But > it is also fine if you work on the MP. > > So keep on going! > > Stani > > BTW are you coming to the python meeting on thursday? I'm planning to > present a little bit about phatch 0.2 It would be good to meet there. > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Bas van Oostveen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think I could patch / work on / have a very minimal multi-threaded / > > multi-process version this weekend. > > > > But I would not consider such a patch written in a weekend ready to be > > the default. But it could be a command line (or maybe GUI) parameter. > > > > Specially multi-threaded is (as weird as it might sound) easier to > > implement and as far as I've seen also yield significant speed > > improvements. (Fully realising and agreeing with other people's points > > about contention (which is hard to track) and the general dangers of > > threaded code :) > > > > I will try and look at current patch and try port my previous MP work > > into a minimalistic patch. > > > > After that you can always decide to incorperate or not this into a > > release. > > > > Regards, > > Bas > > > > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 22:49 +0200, Stani wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I spoke with ubuntu-motu. If we don't finish Phatch this weekend we > >> will miss Ubuntu Karmic. I really want Phatch in Ubuntu so I will > >> reserve the whole weekend to do as much as I can of my todo list. > >> Juho, please decide what you can do of the blender action before > >> monday and polish it. Igor if you still have some comments/artwork > >> your deadline is saturday. > >> Best regards, > >> Stani > >> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~phatch-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~phatch-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
