Dear colleagues: (apologies for cross-posting)

The distinguished philosopher of physics, Hans Halvorson (Philosophy, 
Princeton University), will give a lecture:
Does the universe need God?

At 5.30 on Wednesday 29 January, at: Queens Lecture Theatre, Emmanuel 
College.   The abstract is below, and  Details are at:
http://www.faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/Lectures.php.

Best, Jeremy Butterfield

--
ABSTRACT:

Twentieth century physical cosmology made "the universe" into a
precise theoretical object, governed by the laws of the general theory
of relativity.  But one result of this theoretical consolidation is
that "the universe" becomes autonomous: it is neither brought into
existence by some supernatural being, nor does its continued existence
require any external intervention.  Indeed, physical cosmology has no
need for the hypothesis of a Creator or Sustainer of the universe.

Shouldn't we then conclude that the universe has no need for God?
On the contrary, I argue that the absence of God from physical
cosmology provides no evidence against the existence of a divine
Creator.  In fact, if the universe and its laws are the result of a
free, creative act of God, then God is not constrained by natural
laws, and God should not occur as the explanans in any scientific
account of the universe.


------
Jeremy Butterfield:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Butterfield
Homepage: http://www.trin.cam.ac.uk/butterfield/
Trinity College, Cambridge CB2 1TQ
Tel: 01223 761524 (office); 07557-668413 (mobile); NB: new mobile number.
Visit the journal, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13552198





_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.

Reply via email to