Dear philosophers

You are all invited to attend a talk by Professor Julian Dodd, of 
Manchester, about the asymmetry of truth (see the abstract below). 
Professor Dodd has worked on some interesting stuff in philosophy of 
music, ontology and truth (including a book about the identity theory of 
truth). See his website for more: 
http://www.manchester.ac.uk/research/julian.dodd/personaldetails.

The talk will take place on Thursday 13 February, at 18.30, in Junior 
Parlour, Trinity College.

Make sure you put down this event in your diaries. There will be wine, 
cheese and worthwhile intellectual entertainment, as always.

TPS Committee


ABSTRACT.

Tiddles is a cat. Suppose that <Tiddles is purring> – the proposition 
that Tiddles is purring – is true. It is true because Tiddles is 
purring. But it is not the case that Tiddles is purring because <Tiddles 
is purring> is true. This is an instance of truth’s asymmetry. Not all 
philosophers believe in truth’s asymmetry. But if we do believe in it, 
we should explain it. Why is truth in this way asymmetric?

A tempting thought is that truth’s asymmetry is underpinned by a 
metaphysical asymmetry: that is, by the obtaining of a non-causal, 
asymmetric determination relation between how things are and the 
truth-values of propositions. On this way of thinking, propositions, if 
true, are metaphysically determined as true by how things are. But I am 
sceptical of such an approach. The right kind of metaphysical 
determination relation is hard to come by and, as I shall try to 
explain, there is something suspect about the very idea that the 
asymmetry of truth could admit of such a metaphysically heavyweight 
explanation.

My rival suggestion is that truth’s asymmetry is really a conceptual 
asymmetry. Outlining a notion of conceptual explanation, borrowed from 
Wolfgang Künne and Benjamin Schnieder, I propose that the asymmetry can 
be neatly explained once we treat the ‘because’ in ‘<Tiddles is purring> 
because Tiddles is purring’ as the ‘because’ of this kind of conceptual, 
rather than metaphysical, explanation. I end by replying to some 
objections to this proposal.

http://trinityphilsoc.weebly.com/

_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.

Reply via email to