Hello everyone, 

Serious Metaphysics continues this Thursday 28 April - Alexander
Greenberg will be presenting 'Sacrifices for the greater epistemic
good?' (abstract below). 1.00-2.30pm as usual, at the philosophy faculty
board room. Feel free to bring your lunch. 

The rest of the termcard can be found at:
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/SMG 

Best wishes,
Li Li 

Abstract: 

It is often claimed that true belief is the fundamental goal of
epistemic justification, i.e. that the fundamental point of having a
justified belief is to have a true one. Call this claim 'veritism'.
Particular examples are alleged to create problems for this claim:
examples in which having a belief that looks prima facie unjustified is
a means to the end of having a large number of other true beliefs. To
illustrate, say a scientist is seeking to get a grant from a religious
organisation that only gives grants to true believers. If this scientist
gets this grant, he'll have many more true beliefs, since he'll be able
to continue his research. However, since this scientist is a terrible
actor, the only way he'll succeed in getting the grant is if he believes
that God exists. Such cases create a difficulty for veritism because if
the scientist were to believes that God because it will lead to many
true beliefs in the future, a) that belief would seem to be unjustified,
but b) because of the true beliefs he'll have in the future, he's doing
well with regards to the aim of true belief. Some have argued that these
examples should lead us to reject veritism. This conclusion, I'll argue,
is unwarranted. A plausible version of veritism can deal with these
examples. But these examples do reveal a fundamental difference between
theoretical and practical normativity. 

-- 

Li Li Tan
PhD (Probationary) in Philosophy
St Catharine's College

 
_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.

Reply via email to