On May 7, 2010, at 10:49 AM, SHOO wrote: > Me challenge at this time is NamedMutex. > > http://ideone.com/EKYBO > > The module about IPC is not included in Phobos and druntime at all now. > I suggest NamedMutex by this contribution experimentally. > NamedMutex can operate like normal Mutex. But NamedMutex allows > reference by name over the process. > This may help that file locking in CGI, restraint of the multi-running > process, etc... > > What do you think?
I think it's a good idea. I would have created one already, but the differences between Win32 and Posix named mutexes are fairly substantial, and I haven't spent the time to figure out how to hide the differences in a way that would make both camps happy. It would be nice if it were possible to have a SharedCondition class that integrates with this as well, though that may turn out to be a tad tricky. > I can say with confidence this time. "I do not see Tango at all." They don't exist in Tango. I know because I created tango.core.sync, which is reflected in core.sync in druntime. _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
