I don't think we need to feature-freeze Phobos. Ideally we'd find some
time to work on its known bugs though.
Andrei
On 06/08/2010 09:24 AM, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad wrote:
Now that TDPL is well on its way, are there any plans to freeze Phobos
in the near future?
(I'm asking because earlier I've proposed some pretty major changes to
std.process and std.path, and I'm hoping to get both considered for
inclusion before it's too late.)
-Lars
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
