I thought the key authors had all signed off publically in the forums and the general concensus from, well, everyone was that objecting in the first place was stupid and the code should be shared.
Has there been more back-channel chatter? Now, if std.gregorian is technically better rather than just different, then I have no objections going that direction anyway. My 2 cents, Brad On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Walter Bright wrote: > Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:03:23 -0700 > From: Walter Bright <[email protected]> > Reply-To: Discuss the phobos library for D <[email protected]> > To: Discuss the phobos library for D <[email protected]> > Subject: [phobos] std.gregorian > > Although I do not believe that SHOO's work on the date/time is legally > infringing on Tango's time code, I feel there's been enough bad feeling about > this and that we should not include Tango's time api design in Phobos. > > I apologize to SHOO for this. I know this is unfair to him. > > Andrei has given a start to std.gregorian, perhaps SHOO's implementation work > can be transferred to this to help complete it? > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
