I think it should be a property. I followed the convention that stuff
that doesn't change "this" is a property.
Andrei
On 06/23/2010 09:01 AM, David Simcha wrote:
Isn't that the point of @property? I just followed what Andrei was
doing. If there's anywhere where I didn't put @property in, it's purely
an unintentional oversight. Please let me know and/or fix it.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Max Samukha <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:07 PM, dsource.org <http://dsource.org>
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
phobos commit, revision 1689
user: dsimcha
save() is sometimes attributed with @property, other times it is
not. Is it really a property? I don't think it is a good idea to tag
every function with @property just to make it callable without ().
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
