http://www.boost.org/users/license.html
Sent from my iPhone On Jun 27, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't understand. What docs are you referring to? > > Andrei > > On 06/27/2010 03:28 PM, Sean Kelly wrote: >> We're following the format outlined in the boost docs. >> >> On Jun 27, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> >>> I'm seeing this at the beginning of Phobos files: >>> >>> /** >>> * ... >>> * License:<a href="http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt";>Boost License >>> 1.0</a>. >>> * Authors: XYZ >>> * >>> * Copyright Digital Mars 2005 - 2009. >>> * Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. >>> * (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at >>> * http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt) >>> */ >>> >>> I don't think we need two mentions of the license, and oftentimes the text >>> appears poorly formatted in the actual doc. I'm thinking of: >>> >>> /** >>> * ... >>> * License: $(WEB boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt, Boost License 1.0). >>> * Authors: XYZ >>> * >>> * Copyright Digital Mars 2005-. >>> */ >>> >>> I'm using the WEB macro to allow non-html doc generation later on, and also >>> am eliminating the closing year from the copyright. >>> >>> Walter - does this work? I'm preemptively doing this formatting on all >>> files I touch. >>> >>> >>> Andrei >>> _______________________________________________ >>> phobos mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos >> >> _______________________________________________ >> phobos mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
