:O I didn't even know there was a druntime list. I should be posting all this stuff there. Sorry.
-Steve ----- Original Message ---- > From: Brad Roberts <[email protected]> > To: Discuss the phobos library for D <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, July 13, 2010 4:47:14 PM > Subject: Re: [phobos] std.instrinsic? > > See this thread in the druntime list: > > http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/d-runtime/2010-June/000024.html > > I completely agree. :) > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Steve Schveighoffer wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:41:32 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Steve Schveighoffer <[email protected]> > > Reply-To: Discuss the phobos library for D <[email protected]> > > To: Phobos <[email protected]> > > Subject: [phobos] std.instrinsic? > > > > Why is the intrinsic module in phobos instead of druntime? > > > > In core.bitop, there's this odd code: > > > > > > > > version(D_Ddoc) > > { > > /** docs for bsf **/ > > int bsf(uint v); > > > > /** docs for bsr **/ > > int bsr(uint v); > > > > ... > > } > > else > > { > > public import std.intrinsic; > > } > > > > ???? > > > > I want to use bsr in lifetime.d, there's a hand-implemented function in >there > > > that's much much slower than the bsr instruction. > > > > -Steve > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > phobos mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
