Re: [phobos] Silent failure of std.container unittests

[Don Clugston]

On 15 July 2010 06:04, Benjamin Shropshire
<benja...@precisionsoftware.us> wrote:
> Le 2010-07-14 à 22:42, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
>>>
>>> I agree. But also simple does not mean crappy. I think there's too much
>>> talk around a simple matter:
>>>
>>> ======
>>> Assertion failure should abort the current unittest block.
>>> ======
>>>
>
> Yes.
Yes.
>
>>> 4. DESIRED: assert is NOT hacked, any failing assert ends the current
>>> unittest, the failure message is printed, execution continues with the next
>>> unittest, program ends with error code if at least one assert failed,
>>> everybody's happy.
>>>
>>>
>
> I want that.
Yes.
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos@puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos