On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Walter Bright wrote:

> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>> 
>> 
>> I was building Phobos on OSX when I ran into a makefile bug that I'd fixed 
>> in linux.mak. It was still present in osx.mak. I noticed the files are 
>> virtually identical, so why not merge them?
>> 
>> Since the one thing that linux.mak and osx.mak have in common is the fact 
>> that they're understood by gnu make (as opposed to win32.mak which is used 
>> by Walter's own make utility), I'm thinking the new makefile should be 
>> called GNUMakefile. That name is actually understood by gmake which means no 
>> more -f.
>> 
>> I'm operating this change and will check in soon, please let me know if you 
>> foresee any issues.
>> 
> 
> I prefer to keep them separate because:
> 
> 1. It's very simple for the user to tell which makefile is for what system. 
> With win32.mak and GNUmakefile it's wtf?
> 2. While they may be the same now, in the future they may be fairly different.
> 3. I like to drive make with my own makefile which then sets some macros and 
> calls -flinux.mak, which would make it difficult to have a makefile that is 
> the default name
> 4. It's *not* a burden to have two makefiles for different platforms. I think 
> it's convenient and self-documenting to have a 1:1 correspondence between 
> platforms and makefiles.
> 5. I like being able to futz with one without risk of breaking all the other 
> platforms that I didn't test it on.
> 6. I find differences in gnu make from system to system, for example, FreeBSD 
> has a much more primitive implementation on it.

druntime has only 2 makefiles though: win32.mak and posix.mak, and I don't 
think it's ever confused anyone.  Why maintain multiple identical makefiles?  I 
do like being able to specify the makefile via -f though.  Some initial testing 
of tool parameter support is required, but once that's sorted out, further 
maintenance shouldn't be an issue.
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Reply via email to