Steve Schveighoffer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with Andrei we need a language solution. The question really is not
> what the solution should do, that much is clear -- apply const to a subset of
> the members (either all references or members designated by some identifier).
>
> The question is, what does the syntax look like. That was the major
> stumbling
> block that flipped Walter's switch to "tail-const doesn't work".
I can think of a similar syntax as the inout for functions:
wild struct Range
{
wild(Node)* cur;
@property wild(V) front() wild { return cur.value; }
void popFront() wild { cur = cur.next; }
@property bool empty() wild { return next !is null; }
}
This wouldn't work with nested structs though.
Shin
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
