I also like ltk process quite a bit. One q - why the need for a special type UnbufferedFile?

Andrei

David Simcha wrote:
This looks terrific. I've always found the old std.process to be way underpowered, especially on Windows. Does your statement about cross-platformness imply that Windows will eventually be supported, too?

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:04 -0400, Adam Ruppe wrote:
     > I actually use it (which is why I duplicated your bug), but am OK
    with
     > removing it, since it is easy enough to get at anyway. For a while, I
     > did a separate extern(C) for pclose anyway!
     >
     > However, I don't think something being POSIX only is a good reason to
     > remove something. D should take advantages of whatever platform it is
     > on. Portability is good when you can have it, but it shouldn't be a
     > function killer alone.

    Two comments:

    1. I disagree with you. :)  I think that Phobos' user-visible interface
    should be completely platform agnostic.  Code that depends only on
    Phobos should compile and run on any platform.

    2. Steve and I have been working on a new version of std.process, which
    will at some point, hopefully, obviate the need for popen().  See
    pipeProcess() here:

     http://www.kyllingen.net/code/ltk/doc/process.html

    The POSIX implementation is more or less complete, but its inclusion in
    Phobos is currently being blocked by bug 3979.  Also, Steve has run into
    some very tricky issues with pipes on Windows, fundamentally caused by
    D's dependence on the DMC runtime.  I don't know how (or if) that is
    working out.

    -Lars

    _______________________________________________
    phobos mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos



------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Reply via email to