On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 11:10 +0200, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:17 +0200, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:46 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > > > Incidentally a colleague of mine mentioned today a much faster > > > implementation of popen(): > > > > > > http://blog.famzah.net/2009/11/20/a-much-faster-popen-and-system-implementation-for-linux/ > > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/popen-noshell/ > > > > > > We should get that in Phobos. > > > > This is very useful information! I'll see if this can be incorporated > > in the new std.process. > > I had a more thorough look at it now, and from what I can understand, > this trick trades safety for speed.
Forget it. execve() takes care of creating a new memory space. I'll definitely add this to std.process. -Lars _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
