On Saturday 21 August 2010 16:34:02 David Simcha wrote:
>  I disagree for two reasons:
> 
>  1.  enforce() generates so much code that it's likely that very few
> compilers would inline it, and then also inline the function calling it.

I thought that the issue wasn't so much that enforce() isn't inlined as that a 
function which called enforce() isn't inlined.

- Jonathan M Davis
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Reply via email to