Deprecate std.perf, too.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Suggestions:
1. Put it inside std.date, though I agree that the name isn't
suggestive (it does include time-related stuff as of today).
2. Create std.datetime from std.gregorian and stopwatch, and when
we're done with the calendar stuff (did you guys see the recent
related posts?) we deprecate std.date.
3. Create std.time, put stopwatch in it, and later move std.gregorian
in std.date.
Opinions? Shoo, what's your preference?
Andrei
On 08/23/2010 04:12 AM, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad wrote:
Me too. IMHO, it should either be part of a new std.datetime module
together with the std.gregorian stuff, or std.stopwatch should be
renamed to std.timer, std.timing, or something like that.
-Lars
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 23:00 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Still unhappy about the addition of a module with a name narrow enough
to preclude any further extensions.
Andrei
On 08/22/2010 10:11 AM, dsource.org wrote:
phobos commit, revision 1919
user: SHOO
msg:
Added stopwatch module
Added StopWatch, Ticks, systime, apptime, comparingBenchmark,
measureTime.
http://www.dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1919
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
