I don't understand this argument. If we're going to have a snowball's
chance in Hell of winning over C#, Java or Python programmers en masse,
we need a huge standard library. I think we should fully commit to
building one even if it doesn't happen overnight. Of course the growth
of it will look somewhat uneven initially, as people contribute whatever
code they have available to Phobos and some things will temporarily seem
out of place in a generally small standard library. I don't see this as
that big a deal, though, as long as the modules in question are fairly
standalone modules that don't need to integrate tightly with the rest of
Phobos.
On 8/25/2010 8:14 PM, Don Clugston wrote:
On 26 August 2010 00:26, Benjamin Shropshire
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Walter,
Benjamin Shropshire wrote:
I have offered up a library that supports statically encoding units
in the type system so as to prevent unit errors (adding distance and
time) and to enforce correct conversions all around.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3725
I'm looking for comments: What's holding it back from inclusion? What
would need to be improved? The API? Better comments? (I haven't
tested it recently so; make it build again?)
I have significant concerns about this, though not related to the code
itself. It's an excellent test case for the template system, and it's
something the language needs to be able to do. However, my feeling is
that this is really quite niche. I've seen a few implementations of
the idea in C++, but I've not seen much evidence that anyone actually
uses it. I fear it might be a solution in search of a problem.
Does it really belong in the core library?
Partly this comes back to the question of how big we expect Phobos to
eventually become. If it were already hundreds of modules, there
wouldn't be much question. But to my mind, including this code would
mean we're committing to an enormous Phobos. I don't think we're ready
for that yet.
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
