Hi again,
I think a solid serialization mechanism is vital for communicating data
across threads effectively.
MessagePack is a solid binary offering, but it doesn't offer the upper
layers needed for a complete serialization solution. As it stands, it is
a good transport mechanism. I confess, however, I wished we adopted a
more widely used binary protocol such as Thrift.
Anyway, I don't see why MessagePack could not be one of the available
transport mechanisms in a wider serialization library that has pluggable
transports.
Thoughts?
Andrei
On 6/5/10 0:57 PDT, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
I resend this mail. Somehow, I didn't reply to Phobos ML.
code and documentation is here:
code: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/374829/std/msgpack.d
doc: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/374829/std/msgpack.html
zip: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/374829/std_msgpack.zip (archives code and
doc)
Masahiro
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 05:24:53 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
I think we should do a review first, and establish this practice for
future proposals as well. Could you please send the code and the
documentation?
Andrei
On 06/04/2010 02:19 PM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
A month ago, I announced msgpack4d at D.announce.
After that, I fixed bugs and improved some features.
Additional list:
- real support (suggested by Lars)
- enum support (reported by Hoshi)
- direct-conversion deserializer (suggested by Michel).
- DeflateFilter (originally DeflationBuffer)
A community review settled down.
I think current status is practicable quality.
So, I would like to add this to Phobos.
Do you see any problems?
Masahiro
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
