On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 03:24 -0500, Yao G. wrote: > I did a quick dive on Johnathan code, and I think it's > superb. I think it deserves a review, because it could be a better > candidate to inclusion that mine. I'll continue porting the Boost date > time library, because as I'm using it on my own code, but obviously the > better one should be picked.
I haven't had time to really test Jonathan's code, but I've looked at it and I agree it looks very good. Which one is the better of Yao's and Jonathan's, I cannot say. They both have their strengths, and neither is complete yet. Perhaps we should ask for a vote on the NG? -Lars _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
