On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 9/25/10 12:25 CDT, Brad Roberts wrote: > > Really? Disabling optimization, calling it an interim fix, and suggesting > > that > > Walter can re-enable the optimization? Those are all signs of not-fixed to > > me. > > Brad, it is a fix in the sense that it makes the test work as expected and has > no regression. I pored over the code for a couple of hours and I couldn't get > into it. The bug is more than two years old, and I did the best I could to fix > it. It now is fixed. > > If you feel that regex has a performance issue, feel free to submit a new > report - or better yet, figure out how to fix optimize(). > > Andrei
Calm down. I don't understand the defensiveness. I saw a checkin that asked for follow up and suggested adding a ticket to track it. The submit does work around the reported bug, which is all good by itself. I'm not personally affected either way and don't have a vested interest in the bug. I do have a desire to help keep us from loosing track of things and incrementally improve the d ecosystem. Sigh, Brad _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
